Federal Appellate Court Holds Reliance Standard Breached Its Fiduciary Duties to Life Insurance Participant in Minnesota

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company was a fiduciary that breached its fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty to its life insurance participant.

Background

Beth Skelton was a corporate group sales manager for Davidson Hotels LLC. With her employment, she was able to enroll in a number of employee benefit plans, including life insurance. Initially, she enrolled in basic life insurance. However, she later sought to enroll in the supplemental life insurance.

Ms. Skelton received a benefit verification form that showed she had supplemental life insurance coverage and the corresponding premiums were deducted from her paycheck by Davidson Hotels and submitted to Reliance Standard.

Soon thereafter, she became ill and went on disability, eventually passing away. Her husband and beneficiary, Corey Skelton, submitted a claim for benefits to the insurance company, Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, but the claim was denied. The reason was Ms. Skelton never completed an Evidence of Insurability (“EOI”) form. Thus, she was never actually enrolled in the supplemental life insurance.

Lawsuit against Reliance Standard

Mr. Skelton sued both Davidson Hotels LLC and Reliance Standard. Davidson quickly settled but the case proceeded against Reliance.

The trial court found that Reliance Standard had breached its fiduciary duty for failing to have an accurate system that would not allow the collection of premiums until participants were actually enrolled and coverage was effective. The trial court ordered Reliance to pay the difference owed between the settlement amount with Davidson and the entirety of supplemental life insurance benefits.

Reliance then appealed to the Eighth Circuit.

Appellate Court Held Reliance Standard Accountable

On appeal, the Eighth Circuit began by examining whether Reliance was a fiduciary regarding enrollment. In reviewing the life insurance policy and Reliance’s duties, it held that Reliance was indeed a fiduciary that owed the duties of prudence and loyalty to plan participants.

Next, the Court looked at Reliance’s actions to determine whether Reliance breached those fiduciary duties. In collecting premiums, Davidson would send to Reliance the number of employees being insured and one bulk check for all premiums. Reliance would send to Davidson a monthly report with all pending applications but did not distinguish which ones had already submitted EOIs and those who did not. Between how the plan was set up and administered as well as Reliance’s system of incomplete communication, the Eighth Circuit held that Reliance breached its fiduciary duties.

Ultimately, the Court agreed Reliance owed the difference between the amount Davidson settled for and the supplemental life insurance benefit amount.

Lawyers with Expertise in Disability Insurance and Life Insurance Claims

Because we specialize in long-term disability and life insurance claims, our clients get the benefit of:

  1. Having an attorney who is an expert in ERISA claims and appeals.
  2. Having an attorney who has experience with every major disability and life insurance company.
  3. Being backed by a law firm with a proven track record of winning tough disability and life insurance lawsuits.

Choose Dabdoub Law Firm to get experienced lawyers on your side.

We can help with:

  • Submitting and managing disability insurance and life insurance claims.
  • Appealing long-term disability denials and lower court decisions.
  • Negotiating lump-sum settlements and life insurance payouts.
  • Filing a lawsuit against your employer and/or disability or life insurance company.

The firm represents clients nationwide with disability claims governed by federal law, even if we are not located in your state.

Contact Dabdoub Law Firm today at (800) 969-0488 or fill out the online contact form to speak with an experienced attorney about your case.

Categories